RoboCupRescue 2010 - Robot League Team Pelican United (JAPAN)
Kazunori Ohno, Tomoaki Yoshida
Tohoku University Graduate School of Information Sciences, Tohoku University 6-6-01 Aramaki Aza Aoba, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8579 Japan; Chiba Institute of Technology Future Robot technology center 2-17-1 Tsudanuma Narashino Chiba 275-0016 Japan
http://www.rm.is.tohoku.ac.jp/
Abstract This paper describes our team organization and our tracked vehicle 'Kenaf2' and Quince that are successors of our developed tracked vehicle with four sub-tracks such as TP07, Hibiscus, and Kenaf1. In this year, our team will compose of 3 sub-teams. The new robot "Kenaf2" and "Quince" hasve 6 DOF: a whole track body and four sub-tracks. They will be more stable, more powerful, and easier to operate in rubble. We've done much on-site training of our robot with people from fire depot, and found flaws to be improved. The Kenaf2 and Quince are the answer to it. We will also improve the ability of map construction, autonomy, and manipulation.
Introduction
This paper describes our team organization and our tracked vehicle 'Kenaf2' and 'Quince' that are successors of our developed tracked vehicles with four sub-tracks such as TP07, Hibiscus, and Kenaf [1]. In this year, our team will compose of 3 subteams: Chiba Institute of Technology, Tohoku University and AIST. The new robot "Kenaf2" and "Quince" have 6 DOF: a whole track body and four sub-tracks. It will be more stable, more powerful, and easier to operate in rubble. We've done much onsite training of our robot with people from fire depot, and found flaws to be improved. The Kenaf2 and Quince is the answer to it. We will also improve the ability of map construction, autonomy, and manipulation. The details of autonomous system and multi robot mapping are described in [5].
1. Team Members and Their Contributions
Our team "Pelican United" is organized with members from Tohoku University, Chiba Institute of Technology, and Advanced Industrial Science and Technology.
- Eiji Koyanagi Mechanical design
- Itsuki Noda Integration of sensing information into GIS
- Keiji Nagatani High level locomotion command system
- Satoshi Tadokoro Adviser
- Kazunori Ohno 3D mapping and autonomous control algorithm
- Tomoaki Yoshida System and Software architecture design
- Eric Rohmer Automatic sub-tracks control algorithm
- Naoki Miyahara Automatic sub-crawler control algorithm
- Yasushi Hata 3-D mapping and recognition
- Masashi Yamazaki Autonomous control algorithm
- Ken Sakurada 3-D mapping and localization
- Eijiro Takeuchi Multi-robots SLAM
- Seiga Kiribayashi Mechanisms assembly and operator
- Hidehisa Akiyama Integration of sensing information into GIS
- Student member Autonomous control algorithm
- Student member Mechanisms assembly
- Student member Mechanisms assembly
- Ikuko Tanimura Travel and Video Support
20. Operator Station Set-up and Break-Down (10 minutes)
The operator station is packed in one middle size Pelican case, and the robot is also packed in two middle size Pelican cases. Total weight will not exceed 150kg, and considering that the pelican cases are equipped with wheels and handles, it is possible to carry by one person.
Most time consuming step of the set-up process in the operator station is to boot up the PCs , and establish wireless connection between the station and the robot. We will save a map data as some electrical data, and will submit it. It is easy for Robocup stuffs to share the victim's information.
We will plan that the number of operator is only one. The operator will control some robots during the competition.
21. Communications
We use IEEE 802.11a (5.2GHz Band) for both control and sensing (including video, Laser Ranger Finder etc) communications. In Japan, all WLAN RF power is restricted to 10mW. Therefore our robots and operator station are also use 10mW of RF power.
Rescue Robot League Pelican United (Japan) - Frequency Allocation
| Frequency | Channel/Band | Power (mW) |
|---|---|---|
| 5.0 GHz - 802.11a | 36-64 | 10mW |
| 2.4 GHz - 802.11b/g | - | - |
| 2.4 GHz - Bluetooth | - | - |
| 2.4 GHz - Other | - | - |
| 1.2 GHz | - | - |
| 900 MHz | - | - |
| 40 MHz | - | - |
| 27 MHz | - | - |
25. Control Method and Human-Robot Interface
Please use this section to describe your plan for controlling your robot [remote teleoperation, partial autonomy, full autonomy], and your human-robot interface for robot control and victim recognition. Also explain what your operator will be doing during missions and which tasks are autonomous.
We will control our tracked vehicles in remote tele-operation and full autonomy. For tele-operation, the locomotion of the robot is controlled with single popular joypad equipped with 2 analog stick and 12 digital bottoms. The operator recognizes a surrounding environment of the robot trough video information of a bird view camera, and range data from laser range scanners. With the baseline system, all decisions should be made by the operator
A pan-tilt-zoom camera on the robot will be controlled using touch panel on the video display. The touch panel seems very handy than usual pointing device such as mouse or trackball, especially when the operator is not sit down on a chair.
Information expected to be shown such as video from several cameras, range data, gradient sensor readings, is too much for single LCD panel. We organize this information fit with two LCD panel, and built such operator station.
In addition, we are working on autonomous control of sub-tracks and autonomous exploration system. These autonomous robots will build maps using 3-D laser scanner and find victims using a thermal camera. We will use these new technologies on the RoboCupRescue competition.
26. Map generation/printing
The robots can measure 3-D shape using a 3-D laser scanners or one fixed 2-D laser scanner. Using range data from such laser scanners and robot's position and posture estimated from odometry and IMU such as gyro sensors and gradient sensors, our robots will build a semi-automatic 2D/3D hybrid map(2D SLAM with 3D range data). In last RoboCupRescue competition, we tried to build such multi-robot SLAM. It works well in basic experiment. However, it did not work in real competition. We will improve our method and build maps.
27. Sensors for Navigation and Localization
We will use gyro-based odometry for position estimation. For odometry based navigation, each motor is equipped with incremental encoder. Also, 3-axis gyro sensor, 3 axis gravity sensor are placed inside the robot. To compensate odometory error, 2D SLAM will be performed beside with manual compensation by the operator himself. To recognize environment by the operator, a bird-view camera, and pan-tilt-zoom camera is used. The configuration of these cameras is almost same as last year model.
28. Sensors for Victim Identification
A pan-tilt-zoom camera is used for victim identification. For supplemental use, a thermal camera and CO2 sensor are also mounted on top of the robot. Bi-directional audio communication will be implemented until the competition.
29. Robot Locomotion
The robot is equipped with 2 full-body tracks and 4 sub-tracks for locomotion. We recognize the problem with last year model, and re-design to improve mobility on rough terrain. Main improvements are as follows: Powerful motors are used for locomotion. The center of gravity of Kenaf2 is lower than one of Kenaf. Material of Crawler is changed new one. The new model of our robot should work better than kenaf, "which is winner of 2007 RoboCupRescue mobility competition", on step fields. In addition, we are building new tracked vehicle "Quince". The difference between Quince and Kenaf is wide body for increasing stability.
30. Other Mechanisms
The structure of our robot is designed the maintenance task in mind. We use safe and powerful batteries for the Kenaf2, which can be carried by airplane.
31. Team Training for Operation (Human Factors)
Our operator is trained on the training facility of fire depot periodically. In such event, volunteers from fire depot also operate our robot. They operate our robot well, with a few minutes instruction. The fact shows our robot requires almost no training to operate.
32. Possibility for Practical Application to Real Disaster Site
We've already used a base model of our robot on the site at the Mid Niigata Prefecture Earthquake in 2004. Our robot was used to check damages of underground pipe from inside of it.
33. System Cost
Now, we sell base system of Kenaf2 at about $22000(US) for Japanese researchers in JAPAN, because the system is still improved in our team, and we can only support them in Japanese. However, we are making Kenaf2 Quince with a Japanese company as product. We are planning to sell the Kenaf2 and Quince at cheaper price in the world.
34. Lessons Learned
In the last competition, we modified our hardware and software for the debug and the improvement. We think that the our robot will change according to the field and the rules during the competition. Especially, software will change drastically because the rules often change during the competition.
References
- Tomoaki Yoshida, Eiji Koyanagi, Satoshi Tadokoro, Kazuya Yoshida, Keiji Nagatani, Kazunori Ohno, Takashi Tsubouchi, Shoichi Maeyama, Itsuki Noda, Osamu Takizawa, Yasushi Hada, "A High Mobility 6-Crawler Mobile Ro-bot 'Kenaf'," Proc. 4th International Workshop on Synthetic Simulation and Robotics to Mitigate Earthquake Disaster (SRMED2007), pp.38 , 2007.
- Kazunori Ohno, Shouich Morimura, Satoshi Tadokoro, Eiji Koyanagi and Tomoaki Yoshida, "Semi-autonomous Control System of Rescue Crawler Robot Having Flippers for Getting Over Unknown-Steps," Proc. of IEEE/RSJ Inc. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems,pp.3012-3018, 2007.
- K. Ohno, T. Kawahara, and S. Tadokoro, "Development of 3D Laser Scanner for Measuring Uniform and Dense 3D Shapes of Static Objects in Dynamic Environment," Proc. of the 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, 2008.
- K. Nagatani, N. Tokunaga, Y. Okada, and K. Yoshida, "Continuous Acquisition of Three-Dimensional Environment Information for Tracked Vehicles on Uneven Terrain," Proc. of the 2008 IEEE International Workshop on Safety, Security and Rescue Robotics, 2008, pp. 25–30.
- Keiji Nagatani, Yoshito Okada, Naoki Tokunaga, Kazuya Yoshida, Seiga Kiribayashi, Kazunori Ohno, Eijiro Takeuchi, Satoshi Tadokoro, Hidehisa Akiyama, Itsuki Noda, Tomoaki Yoshida, Eiji Koyanagi, "Multi-Robot Exploration for Search and Rescue Missions. -A Report of Map Building in RoboCupRescue 2009-,"Proc. of 2009 IEEE International Workshop on Safety, Security, and Rescue Robotics, 2009.